Archive for category Chemtrails, Weather Modification & Geoengineering
by: Susanne Posel
August 2, 2012
By making carbon taxes a global and integral part of the “fee-and-dividend approach”, these climate change alarmists want to redistribute wealth from country to country as the globalists at the UN have outlined in various eco-terrorist manifestos.
However, real scientific data from real world observations and not the IPCC’s falsified computer model projections are painting a different picture of what is actually happening with our weather and what the true effects of climate change actually are.
by: Susanne Posel
July 18, 2012
A recent study by alarmist Philip W. Mote, director of the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute at Oregon State University claims that global warming is 20 times more likely the cause of last year’s heat wave in Texas which was directly causational to the overwhelming emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere.
The study, which covered the 2011 weather events , was rushed to be ready for publication by February of 2012.
The study entitled, “Did human influence on climate make the 2011 Texas drought more probable?” surmised that even though it was probable that the drought was responsible for the heat wave, Mote decided to interject that it was more probable that human influence was the ultimate cause of the extreme temperatures.
Mote is convinced that while scientists are not 100% sure that human influence is an encompassing cause of “extreme events” and they are not without doubt about the response the biosphere has to “the stuff we’re putting into the atmosphere”, nevertheless, “We are, in a sense, setting up our descendants for a set of weather events that may cause varying degrees of harm. And the less greenhouse gases we put into the atmosphere, the less harmful those events will be.”
by:Paul Adams, J.D.
July 17, 2012
In earlier times it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people then to control a million people. - Zbigniew Brzezinski (Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Carter/Obama Advisor).
The cancer epidemic is a soft-kill operation and a move by the world’s so-called elites to cull the human population. It is well documented that the Club of Rome, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, the Rockefellers, Warren Buffet and many other globalists plan to dominate and decimate humanity with their population reduction agenda.
As we will see, the globalists first cause the cancer and then provide us with their ineffective treatments (not cures) for profit. This method is known as Problem – Reaction – Solution.
According to the American Cancer Society, 1,638,910 new cancer cases will arise in the United States during 2012. Approximately 577,190 American cancer patients are expected to die from their cancer this year as well. One in every two men will suffer from cancer (one in four will die) as will one in every three women (one in five will die). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cancer is the second leading cause of death, closely trailing heart disease.
In 1971, President Nixon and Congress declared war on cancer. Since then, the federal government has spent well over $105 billion to battle cancer. In 2010 alone, the National Cancer Institute had a budget of $6.4 billion. As of March 2011, the Susan B. Komen Foundation, allegedly leading the fight against breast cancer, had $439,451,449 in “total public support and revenue.” Pharmaceutical giant Merck alone had a 2010 research and development budget of 8.12 billion.
Why all the death and suffering despite billions, if not trillions, in government and private cancer research? Why have cancer treatments remained almost unchanged since the 1950s: toxic radiation, toxic chemotherapy, and surgery?
The answer is simple: treating cancer is profitable; curing it is not. Cancer also furthers the globalist goal of massive depopulation.
by: Sayer Ji
July 16, 2012
In the three days that followed the 9/11 terrorist attacks, when all commercial flights above the continental US were suddenly suspended, a veil was lifted on the profound, though until that point unconfirmed, effects that aviation-associated artificial clouds are having on our planetary environment.
In the August 2002 edition of Nature, which is ranked the world’s most cited interdisciplinary journal, a report was published titled “Contrails reduce daily temperature range,” where scientists discuss how “a brief interval when the skies were clear of jets unmasked an effect on climate.”
Three Days Without Contrails
The post-9/11 grounding of all commercial aircraft resulted in the sudden disappearance of condensation trails (contrails) from jet aircraft across the entire United States. According to theNature study, the potential of contrails “…from jet aircraft to affect regional-scale surface temperatures has been debated for years…,” but it was not until the three-day grounding period that doubts concerning the existence of the phenomenon could be put to rest.
The Phenomenon: A 1.8 Degree Celsius Increase In Temperature in North America
The study found “…an anomalous increase in the average diurnal temperature range (that is, the difference between the daytime maximum and night-time minimum temperatures) for the period 11-14 September 2001.”
They go on to explain: “Because persisting contrails can reduce the transfer of both incoming solar and outgoing infrared radiation and so reduce the daily temperature range, we attribute at least a portion of this anomaly to the absence of contrails over this period.”
They arrived at their measurements by analyzing maximum and minimum temperature data from approximately 4,000 weather stations through the conterminous United States (excluding Hawaii and Alaska) for the period 1971-2000, and compared them to the three-day post-9/11 grounding period.
They found an increase in the diurnal temperature range (DTR) of approximately 1.1 degree Celsius over normal 1971-2000 values, and an increase of 1.8 degrees during the grounding period in contrast to the adjacent three-day periods analyzed when DTR values were near or below the mean.
This is a highly significant finding as “The increase in DTR is larger than any during the 11-14 September period for the previous 30 years…,” and since “…the 11-14 September increasing DTR was more than twice the national average for regions of the United States where contrail coverage has previously been reported to be most abundant (such as the Midwest, northeast and northwest regions).”
by: Susanne Posel
July 14, 2012
The UN Environmental Program has many versions of geo-engineering up their sleeve to ultimately “manipulate the environment”. The thinking behind geo-engineering is to “reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough to keep the planet from warming to a dangerous degree”, however they admit that the “feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions are uncertain and there are unknown risks to the environment and humans.”
Chemtrails, which are just now receiving media coverage, are but one way the global Elite was manipulating our biosphere. Ocean fertilization is a method of CO2 sequestering that is supported by the globalist think-tank The Royal Society.
The technique uses iron and “other nutrients” that induce microscopic marine plants to absorb CO2 through the natural process of photosynthesis. As they inject the CO2, the plankton releases it back into the ocean at a lower depth.
Stanford and Oregon State Universities have suggested that the $100 billion venture to fertilize our oceans is not a viable course of reducing CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere. They found that the process of pumping CO2 into plankton, or algae, does not have the desired effect of converting the CO2 to the deeper levels of the ocean.
Back in 2010, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), which is part of UNESCO, published a studythat approved of ocean fertilization as a “preventative” measure of sequestering CO2 in the deep oceans.
Dr. Michael Lutz, lead author of the study, said: “This discovery is very surprising. If, during natural plankton blooms, less carbon actually sinks to deep water than during the rest of the year, then it suggests that the Biological Pump leaks. More material is recycled in shallow water and less sinks to depth, which makes sense if you consider how this ecosystem has evolved in a way to minimize loss. Ocean fertilization schemes, which resemble an artificial summer, may not remove as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as has been suggested because they ignore the natural processes revealed by this research.”