Posts Tagged Lockheed Martin

Classified Advanced Antigravity Aerospace Craft Utlizing Back-engineered Extraterrestrial Technology

via: DrBoylan
by: Richard Boylan, Ph.D

As a behavioral scientist and clinician, I have been working for over 15 years with persons who report having had an encounter with an extraterrestrial intelligent life form, a Star Visitor. During the course of this work I have felt it necessary to learn as much as possible about the veridical reality of UFOs, and what the government already knows about these visitors from afar.

As information on Star Visitors and their encounters with humans piled up, I began to publish my findings, presenting them at national and international conferences, in specialty journals, and in media interviews. This in turn brought me to the attention of certain figures, currently or formerly in highly-classified sectors of government and the military ad intelligence agencies. These individuals decided to leak certain additional information to me, knowing that I would thus serve as a conduit to bring such leaked information to the attention of the portion of the public interested and ready for such information.

Because the existence and operations of various undeclared or secret government installations related to Star Visitor matters are not going to be plumbed without field research, I made it my task, starting in 1992, to reconnoiter, observe, and in some instances penetrate many of the most important of these installations. I reasoned that the knowledge I gained could be very helpful to the experiencers who consult with me, to help them feel secure that they had not hallucinated, but that such advanced technology exists, and in fact, the American government is in possession of some of this technology.

Additionally, the hundreds of experiencers of encounters shared with me information they possessed, including about advanced U.S. craft, either by reason of being told such things by the Star Visitors, or by being kidnaped by rogue military-intelligence units and taken aboard one of these craft to one or other of these installations, or viewed such craft once they arrived. This added to my store of information and data on advanced U.S. antigravity craft.
While I have gathered, or been entrusted by others with, considerable information on special American aerospace craft, I do not purport to know everything that is in the U.S. arsenal, nor everything about the operations and capabilities of the craft that I am about to identify. What I know is presented here. I have held nothing back.

At this time, I am aware of the existence of 12 kinds of special-technology advanced aerospace platforms [mil-speak for craft], all incorporating antigravity technology in some form. These 12 are: the Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber, the F-22 Raptor advanced stealth fighter, and its successor, the F-35 Lightning II advanced stealth fighter; the Aurora, Lockheed-Martin’s X-33A, the Lockheed X-22A two-man antigravity disc fighter, Boeing and Airbus Industries’ Nautilus, the TR3-A Pumpkinseed , the TR3-B Triangle , Northrop’s “Great Pumpkin” disc, Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical’s XH-75D Shark antigravity helicopter, and the Northrop Quantum Teleportation Disc.

Before we examine these 12 exotic aerospace craft, a brief overview of the different forms of generating antigravity fields is in order.

The most primitive antigravity technology is electrogravitic. This involves using voltages in the millions of volts to disrupt the ambient gravitational field. This results in an 89% reduction in gravity’s hold on airframes in such vehicles as the B-2 Stealth Bomber and the TR3-B Astra triangular craft. And given the considerable ambient ionization field I observed around the X-22A, it is reasonable to assume that extreme-voltage electrogravitics is also employed with these craft.

The next level up of sophistication is magnetogravitic. This involves generating high-energy toroidal fields spun at incredible rpm’s, which also disrupts the ambient gravitational field, indeed to the extent that a counterforce to Earth’s gravitational pull is generated . The early British aeronautical engineers called this dynamic counterbary . This may have been used in some earlier American saucers and prototypes, but I have only been told that the secret Nautilus spacefaring craft uses magnetic pulsing , which appears to utilize this technology.

The third level of sophistication, that used in the more modern American antigravity craft, is direct generation and harnessing of the gravitational strong force. Such a strong-force field extends slightly beyond the atomic nucleus of Element 115, an exotic element donated by Star Visitor scientist-consultants to human scientists at S-4, a secret base south of Area 51. By amplifying that exposed gravitational strong force, and using antimatter reactor high energy, and then directing it, it is possible to lift a craft from the Earth and then change directions by vectoring the shaped antigravity force field thus generated. Important information about this third technology is available on Bob Lazar’s website. (1.) This information is also described on the Bob Lazar video. Lazar worked on extraterrestrial technology at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Area 51′s Site S-4. (2.)

All of these technologies are primitive in comparison with the Star Visitors, whose craft utilize field propulsion powered by harnessing Zero Point Energy. Let us now examine these 13 advanced craft in more detail. The amount of information available for each varies; in some cases more is known, in other cases very little.

1) The B-2 Stealth Bomber is manufactured Northrop-Grumman. The Air Force describes it as a low-observable, strategic, long-range heavy bomber capable of penetrating sophisticated and dense air-defense shields. Retired Air Force Colonel Donald Ware passed on to me information from a three-star general he knows, who revealed to him in July that the B-2 [Stealth bombers] have electro-gravitic systems on board; and that this explains why our 21 Northrop B-2s cost about a billion dollars each. (3.)

2) The F-22 Raptor advanced stealth fighter is built by a joint effort of the Lockheed-Martin Skunk Works and Boeing’s Phantom Works. In crude imitation of extraterrestrial starcraft, the guidance system of this aircraft incorporates special Artificial Intelligence (AI), meaning that Star Visitor genetic material is incorporated into the semi-alive and autonomously-functioning guidance system mated with the aircraft. In addition the F-22 has antigravity field propulsion capability, which is exercised selectively by the pilot who is in mental connection with the AI guidance system, which activates the antigravity propulsion as needed in coordination with the F-22′s conventional jet engine thrust, to effect the maneuvering of the F-22 Raptor. I have personally witnessed a F-22 stop on its tail in mid-air and dance slowly and gently about without regard for gravity’s pull.

3) The “next generation” F-35 Lightning II advanced stealth fighter is built by Lockheed-Martin, Northrop-Grumman and BAE. The F-35 also incorporates quasi-alive Artificial Intelligence and antigravity field propulsion, (recovered reworked Star Visitor technologies), in addition to jet thrust.

4) The Aurora is a moderate-sized spacefaring vehicle. The late National Security Council scientist Dr. Michael Wolf (4.) of NSC’s unacknowledged Special Studies Group subcommittee, (formerly called MJ-12), has stated that the Aurora can operate on both conventional fuel and antigravity field propulsion systems. He further stated that the Aurora can travel to the Moon. Wolf had also disclosed to me that the U.S. has a small station on the Moon, and a tiny observation post on Mars (5). Thus I doubt that Dr. Wolf would characterize the Aurora thus, unless it was a vessel already used in making such trips. He disclosed additionally that the Aurora operates out of Area 51, (Groom Dry Lake Air Force Station), at the northeast corner of the Nellis AFB Range, north of Las Vegas, Nevada.

5) The Lockheed-Martin X-33A military spaceplane is a prototype of Lockheed’s other spaceplane, the single-stage-to-orbit reuseable aerospace vehicle, the National SpacePlane. Lockheed-Martin does not say too much about its winged, delta-shape X-33 VentureStar, except to say that we are building it. To be at that stage of development for its public-program SpacePlane, clearly Lockheed-Martin has already long since built prototypes, as well as an unacknowledged military version, which I have dubbed the X-33A. The ‘A’ suffix stands for antigravity.

Colonel Donald Ware, USAF (ret.) told me that he had recently learned from a three-star General that the VentureStar X-33 has an electrogravitics (antigravity) system on board(6.). This virtually assures that the unacknowledged military antigravity version, the X-33 A, must surely also have electrogravitics on board. It is possible that what I have called the X-33A is the Aurora craft which Dr. Wolf described.

6) the Lockheed X-22A is a two-man antigravity disc fighter. The late Colonel Steve Wilson, USAF (ret.), stated that military astronauts trained at a secret aerospace academy separate from the regular Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs, CO. These military astronauts then operate out of Beale and Vandenberg Air Force Bases, Northern California From those bases, these military astronauts regularly fly trans-atmospherically and out into space (7). One of the aerospace craft they use, Colonel Wilson reported, is the X-22A.

Another informant, ‘Z’, aka ‘Jesse’, who formerly worked at the NSA, told me that the Lockheed X-22A antigravity fighter disc fleet is equipped with Neutral Particle Beam directed-energy weapons, that it is capable of effecting optical as well as radar invisibility, and that it is deployable for worldwide military operations from a new U.S. Space Warfare Headquarters, located in Utah. (8).

Recently I also heard from an Army engineer, formerly TDY’ed to NASA, who shall remain unnamed at his request. He also confirmed that Lockheed had made the X-22A, the two-man antigravity fighter disc which I had seen test-flown in a canyon adjacent to the main Area 51 operations zone. He explained why I had seen the X-22A so nervously flown during that test flight. He said that the original X-22A had had a standard altimeter hard-wired into it, but that such an instrument would give faulty readings in the craft’s antigravity field, which bends space-time. He had recommended that they instead use a gradiometer, which would function better. Apparently his suggestion was finally taken up, since in more recent years I have seen the X-22As flying more smoothly and confidently at high altitudes over and near Area 51.

Another informant who wishes his identity kept private related operational details about military deployment of antigravity disc craft which sound like the X-22A. He reports: ‘During operation Desert Storm a close relative of mine was in charge of a Marine Division right on the front. In the first days film footage and especially video-cams which a large number of G.I.s had were impounded, so they wouldn`t capture any sensitive material. Iraq was pumped up and Gung-Ho, since they had well over 50,000 troops ready to charge us, [and] since we only had about 3500 they knew of, and they knew [that], because of the close proximity of troops we couldn`t nuke them, so, they were assuming piece of cake . Wrong.
‘Two pictures my relative confiscated from one of his officers showed: 1. a large disc-shaped craft slightly in front of our men with a high intensity beam of light emitting out of it; then, 2. where men, equipment, etc. was [had stood], there only remained dark charcoal-like spots on the desert floor. We have had this technology for quite a while.’ The described disc was clearly an antigravity, levitating, aerial-weapons platform in the U.S. arsenal. Quite possibly it was the Lockheed X-22A two-man discoid craft, the real DarkStar, of which the unmanned drone X-22 DarkStar is but an aircraft ‘cover’ program to disguise the existence of this manned antigravity fighter disc, the X-22A.

Further, as ‘Z’ noted, the real manned discs come equipped with the latest Neutral Particle Beam weapons, which take apart the target at the molecular level. Star Visitor craft do not incinerate humans. Only human military fighters are so deployed. So the above report does not deal with any extraterrestrial event.

Continue Reading At: DrBoylan.com

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

New Chapter’s new owner [P&G] steeped in animal testing and led by directors with ties to weapons contractors, Big Pharma, Monsanto, Chevron and more

NaturalNews
Friday, March 23, 2012
by Mike Adams

[NaturalNews] NaturalNews has never really taken much of an interest in Procter & Gamble — until now. Having acquired New Chapter, a once-promising supplier of high-end herbal supplements such as Zyflamend, P&G now demands some honest scrutiny. Who are these people that New Chapter has decided to cozy up to? What are their business interests, and what are their ethics?

To answer this question, NaturalNews conducted an investigation of Procter & Gamble’s board of directors in order to determine what business interests those directors might represent. What we found was more than a bit disturbing, and as you will see below, P&Gs board of directors is made up of people with ties to weapons manufacturers, Homeland Security, the Federal Reserve, oil companies, the Fukushima nuclear power plant, global banks, pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology (GMOs), mining giants, black box voting machines, and predictably both Microsoft and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

It’s like a Who’s Who of some of the most destructive industries on the planet, all in one room.

Animal testing of its chemical consumer products

On top of that, P&G is steeped in animal testing of its products, according to a long list of activist websites. We’re going to be covering this in more detail in a future report, but here are some sites where you can start to learn about P&Gs widespread testing of its chemical products in laboratory animals:

http://www.pandgkills.com/facts/index.html
http://www.uncaged.co.uk/pgtesting.htm
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Procter_%26_Gamble#Animal_…

P&G also owns Iams dog food. Check out this video entitled “Iams: A Recipe for Cruelty”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WucllIFy9iU

Moving on to P&G’s board members, here’s what we found in just a few hours of searching public information:

Procter & Gamble’s board of directors

Alan G Lafley

• Also on the board of Directors of General Electric, one of America’s largest weapons manufacturers and the designer of the Fukushima nuclear power facility.

• 5-year compensation total: $41 million

• Helped P&G develop and market brands like Crest, Tide and Pampers (landfill, anyone?)

• Was recognized with the 2010 Hall of Achievement Award, the highest honor given by the Grocery Manufacturers Association (this is the group that strongly opposes honest labeling of GMOs and routinely sides with the business interests of the junk processed foods industry)

• Was inducted into the Advertising Hall of Fame by the Coca-Cola company. Considered a “legend” in influencing the public to buy more stuff they don’t need.

Sources:
http://www.aaf.org/default.asp?id=1315
http://www.ge.com/company/leadership/bios_bod/alan_lafley.html

Ernesto Zedillo

• The former President of Mexico. Yeah, really.

• Independent Director of Alcoa, the aluminum mining giant.

• Independent Director of Citigroup.

• Deeply involved in complex financial instruments: “From 1983 to 1987, he was the founding General Director of the Trust Fund for the Coverage of Exchange Risks, a mechanism created to manage the rescheduling of the foreign debt of the country’s private sector that involved negotiations and complex financial operations with hundreds of firms and international banks.”

• On the international advisory boards of ACE Limited, Rolls-Royce, British Petroleum and JPMorgan-Chase.

• A member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum.

• A member of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation‘s Global Development Advisory Panel.

• Worked for the Central Bank of Mexico, the “Federal Reserve” of Mexico, from 1978-87.

Patricia A Woertz

• President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Archer-Daniels Midland Company

• Held positions at Chevron Corporation

• Compensation for 2010: $11.44 million

Sources:
http://people.forbes.com/profile/patricia-a-woertz/7056

Norman R Augustine

• On the board of both Procter & Gamble and weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin

• Served in the Office of the Secretary of Defense as Assistant Director of Defense Research and Engineering

• He is a former member of the Board of Directors of ConocoPhillips, Black & Decker, Procter & Gamble and Lockheed Martin

• A member of the Advisory Board to the Department of Homeland Security

• Trustee Emeritus of Johns Hopkins (drugs-and-surgery medicine)

• Holds 28 honorary degrees (insert chuckle here, as these are apparently handed out like candy to those who play ball with the global elite)

Ralph Snyderman

• Director Nominee, Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc.

• Independent Director, Targacept, Inc. (a pharma research company)

• Served on board of Axonyx Inc., a predecessor to Raptor Pharmaceuticals
Corp

• Vice president for medical research and development of Genentech, a cancer drug manufacturer that was caught red-handed “ghost writing” speeches for members of Congress to read during health reform debates (http://www.naturalnews.com/027630_Big_Pharma_lobbyists.html).

Sources:
http://people.forbes.com/profile/ralph-snyderman/76616

Scott D Cook

• Independent Director, eBay, Inc.

• Director of Intuit, Inc.

• In 2005, Cook was #320 on the Forbes 400, with a net worth of $1.1 billion. Since the 1990s, he has “more than doubled his donations to Republicans and Democrats, giving the maximum [in 2007] to mainstream politicians such as Mitt Romney and Harry Reid.”

• This guy looks like the least worrisome of the bunch. At least he’s not into weapons, oil, or biotech.

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Cook

Angela F Braly

• Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of WellPoint, Inc., the company sued by doctors for alleged price fixing of drugs as a way to under-pay doctors. (http://www.naturalnews.com/026740_insurance_companies_lawsuit.html)

• Joined RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. in January 1999, then the parent company of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Missouri, as General Counsel, also overseeing government relations.

• Compensation: $13 million

Source:
http://people.forbes.com/profile/angela-f-braly/85870

W James McNerney Jr

• CEO of Boeing Company (Boeing is the largest manufacturer of commercial jetliners and military aircraft, with capabilities in rotorcraft, electronic and defense systems, missiles, satellites and advanced information and communications systems — top-secret government weapons systems, in other words)

• Joined General Electric in 1982, also was executive vice president of GE Capital. GE, as you may know, owns much of the mainstream media and helps set the news agenda to do things like promote war.

• Chairman of the board and CEO of 3M, heading up their “Cardiovascular Devices” division.

• Named Chairman of the President’s Export Council by President Barack Obama

• Compensation in 2011: $22.9 million

• Graduate from Yale University (the “white shoe boyz”)

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_McNerney
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?p…

Maggie Wilderotter

• Former Microsoft executive
• Serves on boards of both Xerox and P&G
• 5-year compensation: $12.98 million

Charles R Lee

• Director, Marathon Oil Corporation
• Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Verizon Communications

Bruce L Byrnes

• Independent Director, Diebold Incorporated, the company accused of “black box voting” scandals in several of the last Presidential elections. (https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ablackboxvoting.org+diebold)

• Vice Chairman of the Board – Global Brand Building Training of The Procter & Gamble Company

Sources:
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=106584&p=irol-govBio&ID=2…

Kenneth I Chenault

• Chairman of American Express
• Compensation in 2011: $23 million
• Director, IBM

Gwendolyn S King

• Gwendolyn isn’t on the board of P&G, but she’s on the board of Monsanto, a company with the same top investors as P&G (http://www.naturalnews.com/035312_New_Chapter_Proctor_and_Gamble_Mons…).

• Board of Monsanto (chairs the Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee, if you can believe Monsanto even has such a committee)

• In addition, she is on the board of Lockheed Martin, the very same weapons contractor tied to other P&G board members. There, she chairs the “Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee.” (You really gotta love these committee names…)

FYI, you can check out Monsanto’s Board of Directors here:
http://www.monsanto.com/whoweare/pages/board-of-directors.aspx

There, you will see that Monsanto’s board members have ties to Microsoft, McDonalds, Sara Lee, Lockheed Martin and other firms.

As we previously reported, Procter & Gamble’s CFO, Jon Moeller, is also on the Board of Directors of Monsanto. He has ties to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. (http://www.naturalnews.com/035312_New_Chapter_Proctor_and_Gamble_Mons…)

Also: http://www.organicauthority.com/foodie-buzz/guess-whos-on-monsantos-b…

New Chapter, P&G, animal testing, weapons manufacturers, Big Pharma — what does it all add up to?

So the story here is very simple: New Chapter is owned by P&G, and P&G’s board of directors is populated by people who also sit on the boards of weapons companies, global banking giants, pharmaceutical companies, Homeland Security, planet-wide polluting oil companies, and of course both Monsanto and Microsoft. It’s like a Who’s Who of the worst jackals you could ever collect in one room. For some inexplicable reason, this is who New Chapter has chosen to not just do business with, but to get into bed with.

That makes no sense to me. I just wanted to buy Zyflamend, I didn’t want my purchase dollars going to support the salaries of people who also help run weapons companies, oil companies and Homeland Security. Since when did nutrition have to involve all this other stuff?

And the bottom line answer is that it doesn’t. You can avoid handing over your money to P&G by simply avoiding New Chapter’s products altogether. When you stop buying New Chapter, you stop funding P&G.

Want proof? Check this out:

New Chapter already funding P&Gs agenda

“This acquisition enables P&G to enter the premium, specialty segment of the vitamin and mineral supplement (VMS) category with a meaningful $100m business on day one,” a P&G spokesperson told NutraIngredients-USA, speaking about acquiring New Chapter.

So on the very first day after the acquisition, New Chapter already delivered $100 million in revenues to Procter & Gamble.

Hmm… I wonder how that money will be used? To pay even fatter salaries to the officers who already have seven-figure salaries? To pay for more animal testing experiments? Now that New Chapter is under the wing of P&G, will New Chapter start conducting animal testing on its products, too? It’s a legitimate question.

And here’s the biggest question of all: If New Chapter is so comfortable with its partnership with P&G, why is there absolutely no mention of P&G on New Chapter’s website?

That’s right: Search their entire website, if you wish. As of this writing, you won’t find a single mention of P&G, Procter & Gamble, or the acquisition by P&G. It’s almost like it’s a secret or something. And I find that odd, because usually if you’re really happy to be partnered with someone, you might at least announce it on your website, right? The lack of mention on New Chapter’s website almost looks like the company is ashamed of who owns it now.

It’s a question of ethics, principles, morals…

Why doesn’t New Chapter at least state on its website that it will not engage in routine animal testing of its products even though its new parent company does? Are there any ethical boundaries the company will refuse to cross, or will it obediently follow in the footsteps of its owner and start populating its own board of directors with people who have ties to Homeland Security, weapons manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies and the like?

These are legitimate questions about a company whose customers have long been vocal advocates of protecting life on Earth through natural living, peaceful conflict resolution, respecting the welfare of animals, and decentralizing control over economies. Natural products people are anti-war. But P&G’s board members also sit on the boards of Lockheed Martin and Boeing, two of the largest weapons manufacturing firms in America. So how does this compute?

It doesn’t. The principles of natural health people are the polar opposite of the principles represented by P&G board members. I suspect they are mostly closet monopolists who wish to dominate, control, centralize and profit — almost at any cost. How else do you get people who pull down a $20+ million annual compensation plan while the people who buy their Tide laundry detergent are barely scraping by on welfare?

Givers vs. takers

Slice it any way you want, but I look at the board of directors of companies like P&G and Monsanto and I can’t find a single example of these people actually helping humanity in any meaningful way. These are not contributors. They are TAKERS. Their claim to fame is merely that they are more clever takers than the next guy. They have managed to put themselves into positions where they take so much that they seem to have forgotten the plight of the people they’re taking from.

That’s what mainstream advertising and marketing is all about, of course: social engineering, behavioral shaping, taking money from people while convincing them that it’s all voluntary on their part. Taking from people through cognitive influence instead of at gunpoint. That’s what P&G is really the master of — not providing healing products that genuinely help the world, but at convincing people they need a plastic bottle filled with petroleum derivatives and artificial fragrance. That’s P&G’s real legacy. In the 1980′s, it seemed brilliant. In 2012 it just seems stupid.

Yes, it matters where you spend your dollars. Your dollars are a vote for your ethics and principles. Every time you buy a product from a company, you encourage that company to expand its influence and power, reflecting whatever principles (or lack thereof) it currently embodies. You want to create a better world? Buy from better companies.

Consume less. Grow more. Reuse, recycle, rethink. And question everything.

Coming up soon: An investigative report into Procter & Gamble and charges of animal cruelty. We’ve now opened a full investigation into this consumer product giant, and we’ll be scrutinizing them on a regular basis thanks to New Chapter’s involvement. Watch for those reports here on NaturalNews.com, the last bastion of a free press for a free People.

Source: NaturalNews.com

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Why Did US Census Bureau Award $500M Contract to Lockheed Martin, Worlds’ Largest Defense Contractor?

The IntelHub
By Marlene Motley
February 24, 2012

Contributed by Marlene Motley Blog

Tying this all together, it seems as though the government has implemented the United Nations’ plan to GPS mark all residences and this will make it possible to send in drones instead of personnel when the government chooses?

UN PROMOTES GPS AND CENSUS TAKING INTEGRATION

In 2004, the United Nations’ Secretariat published a pdf entitled “United Nations Expert Group Meeting to Review Critical Issues Relevant to the Planning of the 2010 Round of Population and Housing Censuses” (subtitled: “Integration of GPS, Digital Imagery and GIS with Census Mapping”).

This study is about GPS mapping during the census process.

On page 2 it says:

“4. The census symposium, held in New York in 2001, provided a comprehensive review of the significant capabilities of GPS, Satellite imagery, GIS and handheld computers, and their relevance to census mapping operations.”

THE PLOT THICKENS

A similar pdf from the UN Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs Statistic Division says that the aim of the meeting was to “set priorities and propose concrete outputs for the developement of the 2010 World Population and Housing Census Programme.”

The meeting was attended by representatives from 18 countries including the US who was represented by Jay K. Keller, Chief of International Relations, US Census Bureau.

US CENSUS BUREAU STARTS USING GPS

In July 2006, NPR carried the story, Census Bureau Adopts GPS to Find American Homes, where it states:

“Two-and-a-half years from now, in early 2009, the Census Bureau plans to send an army of 100,000 temporary workers down every street and dusty, dirt road in America. They will be armed with handheld GPS devices. Robert LaMacchia, head of the Census Bureau’s geography division, says they’ll capture the latitude and longitude of the front door of every house, apartment and improvised shelter they find. ‘We will actually knock on doors and look for hidden housing units,’ he says. ‘We will find converted garages; from the outside, it may not look like anybody lives there.’ But census workers will add each dwelling, legal or not, to the Census Bureau’s Master Address File. Recent proposed budget cuts have put part of this plan in jeopardy. But if Congress restores the money, the census will end up with the geographic coordinates — accurate to within 10 feet — for about 110 million residences.”

ENTER THE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS

Several defense contractors were awarded contracts to help carry out this operation in the US.

From a $500 Million dollar contract awarded to Lockheed Martin, see link, to HARRISwho supplied the GPS handheld devices used by census workers.

BRING IN THE DRONES

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization Act facilitates the government use of unmanned spy planes in US airspace and approves deployment of 30,000 by 2020.

It also requires the FAA to rush a plan to have as many in the air as possible within 9 months.

These drones have been used for spy and assassination missions worldwide.

“We’ve moved from using UAVs primarily in intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance roles before Operation Iraqi Freedom, to a true hunter-killer role with the Reaper.” — General T. Michael Moseley, US Air Force Chief of Staff

In a report by New Scientist, one drone manufactured by Lockheed Martin, one of the contractors used by the census bureau, the RQ-170 Sentinel craft may have been brought down in Iran by jamming its GPS signal.

CONCLUSION

The use of drones removes the human element from the situation.

You cannot reason with a drone and it cannot make a judgment that it may be operating on faulty intel.

Also, there is the potential for the enemies of this country to crash these drones because of the GPS vulnerability.

Marlene Motley is a South Carolina writer and member of Kershaw County Patriots, home of the infamous “Like-Button Chronicles.”

Source: TheIntelHub.com

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 318 other followers