Posts Tagged Smart Money

If The World Is Ending, Here Is What Smart Money Is Doing

via: KingWorldNews
August 8, 2012

Today 40 year veteran, Robert Fitzwilson, wrote the following piece exclusively for King World News.  Fitzwilson, who is founder of The Portola Group, put together a fascinating piece which takes covers everything from Art Cashin, the 70s, and what the smart money is doing right now.  Below is Fitzwilson’s piece.

“The great Art Cashin once said that he was counseled as a young man “not to plan for the end of the world as it is a one-off event”.  As we try to divine our investment future, it is helpful to keep that sage advice in mind.

When I started my career in the early ‘70s, my singular goal was to graduate from a certain business school.  It was the crowning achievement of my young life.  Graduating in 1973, I took a job with an investment firm, eager to learn the business.  Unfortunately, I parachuted right into one of the worst bear markets in history.  It was so bad that we were forced to retreat to libraries to read books about how to invest.

The answer, though, was simple.  Everything was going down.  It did not matter what theory one employed.  The Dow Jones had peaked in January of 1973 at 1067, and dropped like a stone to finally bottom out at 570 at the end of 1974.  Needless to say, my eagerness and budding love of the business was greatly diminished.

I thought it was cruel that I had achieved the crowning achievement of my young life only to find out that the world was going to end.  This was the age of the long gas lines.  To even get gas, one had to have a friend who knew a friend.  You then had to get in line, usually when nobody was looking….

Continue Reading At:


, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

The Dark (Pool) Truth About What REALLY Goes On In The Stock Market: Part 4

via: ZeroHedge
by: Tyler Durden
July 10, 2012

Tyler Durden's picture

Courtesy of the author, we present to our readers the following excerpt from Dark Pools: High-Speed Traders, AI Bandits, and the Threat to the Global Financial System, by Scott Patterson, author of The Quants.

In the dark dawn hours of yet another frigid New York morning, Josh Levine dressed quickly and left his apartment in the shadow of the Twin Towers at Battery Park. He trudged through city blocks clogged with treacherous mounds of packed dirt-pocked snow and ice from the year’s record-breaking string of storms. It was February 16, 1996. A Friday. Earlier that week, IBM’s AI supercomputer Deep Blue defeated world chess champion Garry Kasparov for the first time. Bill Clinton was entering his second term in office. The country was in the midst of a powerful economic boom that would culminate in a massive tech-stock bubble, and Levine and Datek’s army of traders would be at the center of it.

The programmer walked east on Wall Street, then turned south on Broad, passing by the marble façade of the NYSE. At 50 Broad, he took the elevator to the sixth floor and walked past a few early risers, the wired, sunken-eyed day traders for Datek. Staring at their computer terminals, hugging their steaming coffees, waiting impatiently for the action to start at the opening bell, they nodded to Levine quietly as he passed.

Months earlier, Levine had decamped from the tiny cluttered room on the tenth floor of 50 Broad to a larger room on the sixth.

The room quickly slouched toward the en- tropic chaos Levine seemed to thrive in. He brought in an inflatable kiddie pool and populated it with turtles. He grew sea monkeys in a glass jar. An Israeli army bazooka leaned in a corner. The ubiquitous garbage piles, the tech ’zines such as PC World, stacks of computer books, pizza boxes, magazines, crunched Coke cans, crumpled computer printout paper, and candy wrappers rose to the ceiling like tropical plants, competing for space with the baker’s racks of computers, rows of computer terminals lined up on card tables, electric cords and creeping cables shooting out of the floor and through holes in the ceiling.

Levine shed his jacket, sat down before his monitor, and hit a but- ton. His computer hummed awake. It was time. The pieces were in place. Now he was about to bring to life the heretical idea that he’d been nurturing ever since he was a teenage runner in the 1980s.

Typing rapidly, he called up the program. Inputting a few instructions and taking a deep breath, he turned it on. Island was alive.

“Island is here!” Levine wrote on Watcher News. “You now have the ability to execute Island orders from the safety and comfort of your own Watcher.”

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Ministry of [Un]Truth by Eric Sprott

By: Eric Sprott
June 22, 2012

Ministry of [Un]Truth

Speaking at a Brussels conference back in April 2011, Eurogroup President Jean Claude Juncker notably stated during a panel discussion that “when it becomes serious, you have to lie.” He was referring to situations where the act of “pre-indicating” decisions on eurozone policy could fuel speculation that could harm the markets and undermine their policies’ effectiveness.1 Everyone understands that the authorities sometimes lie in order to promote calm in the markets, but it was unexpected to hear such a high-level official actually admit to doing so. They’re not supposed to admit that they lie. It is also somewhat disconcerting given the fact that virtually every economic event we have lived through since that time can very easily be described as “serious”. Bank runs in Spain and Greece are indeed “serious”, as is the weak economic data now emanating from Europe, the US and China. Should we assume that the authorities have been lying more frequently than usual over the past year?

When former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan denied and down-played the US housing bubble back in 2004 and 2005, the market didn’t realize how wrong he was until the bubble burst in 2007-2008. The same applies to the current Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, when he famously told US Congress in March of 2007 that “At this juncture… the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime markets seems likely to be contained.”2 They weren’t necessarily lying, per se, they just underestimated the seriousness of the problem. At this point in the crisis, however, we are hard pressed to believe anything uttered by a central planner or financial authority figure. How many times have we heard that the eurozone crisis has been solved? And how many times have we heard officials flat out lie while the roof is burning over their heads?

Back in March, following the successful €530 billion launch of LTRO II, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi assured Germany’s Bild Newspaper that “The worst is over… the situation is stabilizing.”3 The situation certainly did stabilize… for about a month. And then the bank runs started up again and sovereign bond yields spiked. Draghi has since treaded the awkward plank of promoting calm while slipping out enough bad news to ensure the eurocrats stay on their toes. As ING economist Carsten Brzeski aptly described at an ECB press conference in early June, “Listening to the ECB’s macro-economic assessment was a bit like listening to whistles in the dark… It looks as if they are becoming increasingly worried, but do not want to show it.”4 And the situation has now deteriorated to the point where Draghi can’t possibly show it. Although Draghi does now warn of “serious downside risks” in the eurozone, he maintains that they are, in his words, “mostly to do with heightened uncertainty”.5 Of course they are, Mario. Europe’s issues are simply due to a vague feeling of unease felt among the EU populace. They have nothing to do with fact that the EU banking system is on the verge of collapsing in on itself.

When Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy assured the Spanish press that “There will be no rescue of the Spanish banking sector” on May 28th, the Spanish government announced a $125 billion bailout for its banks a mere two weeks later.6 This apparent deceit was not lost on the Spanish left, who were quick to dub him “Lying Rajoy”. But Mr. Rajoy didn’t seem phased in the least. As the Guardian writes, “Even when the outpouring of outrage forced Rajoy to call a hasty press conference the next day, he still refused to use the word “bailout” – or any other word for that matter – and referred mysteriously to “what happened on Saturday”. He went as far as to say that Spain’s emergency had been “resolved” (“thanks to my pressure”, he said). He then took a plane to Poland to watch the national football team play (“the players deserve my presence”).”7 Sound credible to you?

Then there are the bankers. Back in April, JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon blithely dismissed media reports as a “tempest in a teapot” that referred to massively outsized derivative positions held by the bank’s traders in the Chief Investment Office in London. That “tempest” was soon revealed to have resulted in a $2 billion trading loss for the bank roughly four weeks later. In testimony before the Senate Banking Committee this past week, Dimon explained that “This particular synthetic credit portfolio was intended to earn a lot of revenue if there was a crisis. I consider that a hedge.”8 He went on to add that regulators “can’t stop something like this from happening. It was purely a management mistake.”9 That’s just wonderful. Can we expect more ‘mistakes’ of this nature in the coming months given JP Morgan’s estimated $70 trillion in derivatives exposure? And will the US taxpayer willingly bail out JP Morgan when it does? Everyone knows the derivatives position wasn’t a hedge – but what else is Dimon going to say? That JP Morgan is making reckless derivatives bets overseas with other people’s money that’s backstopped by the US government? Credibility is leaving the system.

There is certainly a sense that the authorities can no longer be candid about this ongoing crisis, even if they want to be. On June 11th Austria’s finance minister, Maria Fekter, opined in a television interview that, “Italy has to work its way out of its economic dilemma of very high deficits and debt, but of course it may be that, given the high rates Italy pays to refinance on markets, they too will need support.”10 Her honesty sent Italian bond yields soaring and earned her some harsh criticism from eurozone officials, including Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti. As one eurozone official stated, “The problem is that this is market sensitive… It’s one thing if journalists write this but quite another if a eurozone minister says it. Verbal discipline is very important but she doesn’t seem to get that.”11 See no evil, hear no evil… and speak no evil. That’s the way forward for the eurozone elites.

We have no doubt that everyone is tired of bad news, but we are compelled to review the facts: Europe is currently experiencing severe bank runs, budgets in virtually every western country on the planet are out of control, the banking system is running excessive leverage and risk, the costs of servicing the ever-increasing amounts of government debt are rising rapidly, and the economies of Europe, Asia and the United States are slowing down or are in full contraction. There’s no sugar coating it and we have to stop listening to politicians and central planners who continue to downplay, obfuscate and flat out lie about the current economic reality. Stop listening to them.

NOTHING the central bankers have done up to this point has WORKED. All efforts have simply been aimed at keeping the financial system from imploding. QE I and II haven’t worked. LTRO I and II haven’t worked, and the most recent central bank initiatives are not even producing short-term benefits at this stage of the crisis. Just take Spain, for example. Following Rajoy’s announcement of the $125 billion bailout loan for the Spanish banks on June 10th, Spanish bond yields were trading back over 7% one week later – the same yield level at which other eurozone countries have been forced to ask for further international aid.12 The market still doesn’t even know what entity is going to pay the $125 billion, let alone when the funds will actually be released or whether the Spanish government will have to count it as part of its national debt. Spain is the fourth largest economy in the eurozone and larger than the previously bailedout Greece, Ireland and Portugal combined. At this point, it’s not even clear if the ECB will be allowed to bail out a country of Spain’s size, let alone Italy, which is now asking the ECB to use bailout funds to buy its sovereign bonds.13

The situation in Europe is becoming an exercise in futility. The positive effects of LTRO I and II, which combined pumped in over €1 trillion into European banks back in December 2011 and February 2012, have now been completely erased by the recent bank runs in Spain. Of the €523 billion released in LTRO II, roughly €200 billion was taken by Spanish banks.14 Of that amount, roughly €61 billion was estimated to have been reinvested back into Spanish sovereign bonds, which temporarily helped Spanish bond yields drop back to a sustainable level below 5.5%. Fast forward to today, and despite the LTRO infusions, the Spanish banks are all broke again after their underlying depositors withdrew billions over the past six weeks. The only liquid assets Spanish banks still own that they can sell to raise euros just happen to be government bonds… hence the rise in Spanish yields. So in essence, the entire benefit of the LTRO, which was a clever way of replenishing Spanish bank capital AND helping calm sovereign bond yields, has been completely reversed in roughly 14 weeks. It’s as we’ve said before – it’s not a sovereign problem, it’s a banking problem. This is why Spanish Prime Minister Rajoy is now pleading for help “to break the link between risk in the banking sector and sovereign risk.”15 Without a healthy sovereign bond market, peripheral eurozone countries simply have no way of supporting their bloated and insolvent banks.

The smart money is finally waking up to the dimension of the problem here and realizing that it’s really a banking issue. Deposit flight has revealed the vulnerability of the European banking system: when depositors make withdrawals, the only assets the banks can sell to raise liquidity are sovereign bonds, which creates the vicious downward spiral that up to this point has always resulted in some form of central bank bailout. Many eurozone authorities still have trouble understanding this. As Spanish Economy Minister, Luis de Guindos, recently stated to reporters at the G20 Summit, “We think… that the way markets are penalizing Spain today does not reflect the efforts we have made or the growth potential of the economy… Spain is a solvent country and a country which has a capacity to grow.”16 Every country has the capacity to grow. Not every country has a domestic banking system that has already borrowed €316 billion from the ECB so far this year (pre the most recently announced bailout), and needs to rollover roughly €600 billion in bank debt in 2012.17 That may be why the markets are reacting the way they are.

If you want to know what’s really going on, listen to the executives of companies that actually produce and sell things. On May 24, Tiffany & Co cut its fiscal-year sales and profit forecasts blaming “slowing growth in key markets like China and weakness in the United States as shoppers think twice about spending on high-end jewelry.”18 On June 8th, McDonald’s surprised the market with lower than expected same-store sales growth in May, following a lacklustre April sales report that the company stated was “largely due to underperformance in the United States, where consumers continue to seek out very low-priced food.”1920On June 13th, Nucor Corp., the largest U.S. steelmaker by market value warned that its second-quarter profit will miss its previous guidance after a “surge” in imports undermined prices and “political and economic uncertainty affect buyers’ confidence”.21 On June 20th, Proctor and Gamble lowered its fourth quarter guidance and profit forecast for 2012. Factors that drove the company’s challenges included “slow-to-no GDP growth in developed markets”, high unemployment levels, significant commodity cost increases and “highly volatile foreign exchange rates”.22 Other companies that have recently lowered guidance include Danone, Nestle, Unilever, Cisco Systems, Dell, Lowe’s, and Fedex. It’s ugly out there, and many companies are politely warning the market about the type of environment they foresee ahead in both the US and abroad.

To give you a hint of how bad it is in Europe today, the most recent retail sales out of Netherlands showed a decline of 8.7% year-over-year in April.23 In Spain, retail sales fell 9.8% year-on-year in April, which was 6% greater than the revised drop of 3.8% in March.24 Declines of this magnitude are not normal occurrences and signal a significant shift in spending within those countries. We fear this is a sign of things to come within the broader Eurozone, which will only serve to complicate an already dire situation that much more.

The G6 central banks are out of conventional tools to solve this financial crisis. With interest rates at zero, and the thought of further stimulus rendered politically unpalatable for the time being, we cannot see any positive solutions to this problem other than debt repudiation. We continue to note the contrast between the reporting companies who by law cannot lie about their fiscal realities, versus the central planners who admit that they MUST lie to preserve calm and control. We’ll leave it to you to decide whose version of the truth you want to believe.


1 Forelle, Charles (May 9, 2011) “Luxembourg Lies on Secret Meeting”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on June 5, 2012 from:
2 Bernanke, Ben S. (March 28, 2007) “Economic Outlook before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress”. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Retrieved on June 8, 2012 from:
3 Evans, Stephen (March 22, 2012) “ECB Chief Mario Draghi says worst of euro crisis over”. BBC News. Retrieved on June 6, 2012 from:
4  Russolillo, Steven (June 6, 2012) “Here’s How to Read Mario Draghi’s Poker Face”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on June 7, 2012 from:
5  AFP (June 16, 2012) “ECB warns ‘serious risks’ for Eurozone, but no inflation”. Associated Foreign Press. Retrieved on June 19, 2012 from:
6  CBC News (May 28, 2012) “Spain says banks won’t need EU rescue” CBC News. Retrieved on June 6, 2012 from:
7  Murado, Miguel-Anxo (June 12, 2012) “‘Bailout’ seems to be the hardest word for Spain’s prime minister”. The Guardian. Retrieved on June 12, 2012 from:
8  AP (June 13, 2012) “‘There was good intent’: JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon APOLOGIZES while explaining $2B loss to Congress
amid protesting hecklers”. Associated Press. Retrieved on June 13, 2012 from:
9 Touryalai, Halah (June 13, 2012) “Jamie Dimon’s Testimony: Volcker Rule May Have Prevented Loss”. Forbes. Retrieved on June 16, 2012 from:
10   Shields, Michael and Scherer, Steve (June 12, 2012) “Austrian minister says Italy too may need bailout”. Reuters. Retrieved on June 12, 2012 from:
11  Ibid.
12   Day, Paul (June 19, 2012) “Spain’s short-term borrowing costs jump at auction”. Reuters. Retrieved on June 20, 2012 from:
13  AP (June 20, 2012) “Europe gropes for crisis fix, bond buys pushed”. Associated Press. Retrieved on June 20, 2012 from:
14   Watts, William (April 13, 2012) “Spain data underlines LTRO downside”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on June 15, 2012 from:
15  Crowe, Darcy (June 18, 2012) “Spain’s Rajoy Calls for Fencing in Banking Risk”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on June 19, 2012 from:
16 Day, Paul and Maltezou, Renee (June 19, 2012) “Spanish short-term debt costs reach alarm levels”. Reuters. Retrieved on June 20, 2012 from:–spanish-short-term-debt-costs-reach-alarm-levels?bn=1
17   Smith, Geoffrey (June 12, 2012) “Spain Deal Doesn’t Stop Sovereign-Bank Feedback Loop”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on June 15, 2012 from:
18   Wahba, Phil (May 24, 2012) “Tiffany forecasts disappoint; U.S., Asia slowing”. Reuters. Retrieved on June 19, 2012 from:
19   Egan, Matt (June 8, 2012) “McDonald’s May Same-Store Sales Come Up Short”. FOXBusiness. Retrieved on June 18, 2012 from:
20   Baertlein, Lisa and Wahba, Phil (May 8, 2012) “Mcdonald’s April U.S. sales miss estimates. Reuters. Retrieved on June 20, 2012 from:
21  Elmquist, Sonja (June 13, 2012) “Nucor Says Profit To Miss Guidance As Steel Imports ‘Surge'”. Bloomberg. Retrieved on June 19, 2012 from:
22   Pichler, Josh (June 20, 2012) “P&G lowers guidance for fourth quarter”. Retrieved on June 20, 2012 from:
23   Van den Oever, Robert. (June 14, 2012) “Dutch Retail Sales Fall 8.7% in April”. Dow Jones. Retrieved on June 20, 2012 from:–14369639/
24  Dowsett, Sonya (May 29, 2012) “Spanish retail sales show record fall in April”. Reuters. Retrieved on June 20, 2012 from:

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

From The Archives – Bunker Hunt And ‘Silver Thursday’

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/18/2012 16:17 -0400

Back in May of last year, just after the now historic silver slamdown of “Silver Sunday” on May 1, 2011, when the metal imploded by nearly 20% in the span of seconds, a move that some considered ‘normal’, primarily the CFTC, we presented the extended biopic of the infamous “Silverfinger”: Bunker Hunt, who attempted to corner the silver market, and succeeded, if only briefly (and they say Playboy has no good articles). Today, courtesy of Grant Williams, we have dredged up the following clip from the archives, which is a 10 minute overview of just how there is really nothing new ever in the silver market, bringing up memories of Silver Thursday, March 27, 1980, and raising questions whether last year the move in precious metals was not due to the same attempt to corner the silver and gold markets as happened 30 years prior. A far more important question perhaps is how was it that tried a redux of the Hunt brothers (and Warren Buffett of course), and when will someone take their place next?


, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment